DCT

2:22-cv-00469

Polaris PowerLED Tech LLC v. Samsung Electronics America Inc

General

Filed

12/12/22

Cause of ActionPatent Infringement

SectorSemicond., Optic

Status

Closed (10/11/24)

Patent Owner

NPE (L)

PACER2:22-cv-00469

Nature of Suit830 Patent

CourtE.D. Texas

Judge	Period	PO Win Rate
James R. Gilstrap	--	35%

Plaintiff

Party

Name	Ratings
Polaris PowerLED Technologies LLC NPE	L4E

Attorney

Name	Ratings
Dacus FirmLocal	L4B
Deron R. Dacus	L5B
Feinberg Day Alberti & Thompson LLP	L3C
Marc Belloli	L5A
Margaret E. Day	L5A
Robert F. Kramer	L5C
Russell Tonkovich	L5C
Kramer Alberti Lim Tonkovich LLP	L3C
Sal Lim	L5B
James P. Barabas	L5C
Nicole E. Glauser	L5C
Robert C. Mattson	L5D
David Alberti	L5D
Jeremiah A. Armstrong	L4C
Andrew G. Hamill	L3B
Ryan Dooley	L3C
Aidan Brewster	L3D

Defendant

Party

Name	Ratings
Samsung Electronics America Inc	L5A
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd	L5A
Samsung Display Co Ltd	L5A

Attorney

Name	Ratings
Gillam & Smith LLPLocal	L5A
Melissa R. Smith	L5A
Andrew T. Gorham	L5A
James T. Underwood	L5A
Baker Botts LLP	L5B
Eric J. Faragi	L5A
Neil P. Sirota	L5A
Morgan G. Mayne	L4B
Kevin M. Sadler	L4E
Lance Goodman	L2A
Emily F. Deer	L2B
Mark Oda	L2B
O Melveny & Myers	L4B
Xin-Yi Zhou	L5A
Ryan K. Yagura	L5A
Marc J. Pensabene	L5A
Timothy S. Durst	L5A
Cameron W. Westin	L5A
Nicholas J. Whilt	L5B
Laura B. Gore	L5C
Benjamin Haber	L3B
Timothy D. Byron	L3C
Miao Liu	---- --
Grant Gibson	---- --
O'Melveny & Myers LLP	L4B
Darin W. Snyder	L5C