DCT

2:19-cv-00291

Ultravision Tech LLC v. Holophane Europe Ltd

General

Filed

08/26/19

Cause of ActionPatent Infringement

SectorSemicond., Optic

StatusClosed

Patent Owner

Operating Company

Judge	Period	PO Win Rate
James R. Gilstrap	--	36%

Plaintiff

Party

Name	Ratings
Ultravision Technologies LLC NPE	L1B

Attorney

Name	Ratings
McKool Smith	L5E
Jennifer L. Truelove	L5A
Samuel F. Baxter	L5A
Brown Rudnick LLP	L2C
Lawrence C. Drucker	L5B
Timothy J. Rousseau	L5D
Alessandra C. Messing	L3C
Sarah G. Hartman	L2B
Fabricant Rubino Lambrianakos LLPLocal	L1C
Alfred R. Fabricant	L1C
Peter Lambrianakos	L1C
Vincent J. Rubino, III	L1C
Daniel J. Shea, Jr.	L1D
Jacob D. Ostling	L1D
John A. Rubino	L1D
Joseph M. Mercadante	L1E

Defendant

Party

Name	Ratings
Holophane Europe Ltd	L2D
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd	L5A
Holophane SA de CV	L2D
Acuity Brands Inc	L2D
Yaham Optoelectronics Co Ltd	---- --
Arizona Tianjin Electronics Products Trade Co Ltd NPE	---- --

Attorney

Name	Ratings
Gillam & Smith LLPLocal	L5A
Melissa R. Smith	L5A
Andrew T. Gorham	L3B
Duane Morris LLP	L4B
Matthew S. Yungwirth	L5A
Gilbert A. Greene	L5B
John R. Gibson	L5C
Aleksander J. Goranin	L4B
Glenn D. Richeson	L3D
Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP	L4B
T. Vann Pearce, Jr.	L5B
Jeffrey L. Johnson	L5C
Yufeng Ma	L5E
Ropes & Gray LLP	L4B
Alexander E. Middleton	L5A
David S. Chun	L5A
Steven Pepe	L5C
Samuel L. Brenner	L4C
Hyun-Joong Kim	L4C
Mann Tindel & ThompsonLocal	L3B
G. Blake Thompson	L3A
J. Mark Mann	L2A