DCT

2:19-cv-00291

Ultravision Tech LLC v. Holophane Europe Ltd

General

Filed

08/26/19

Cause of ActionPatent Infringement

SectorSemicond., Optic

StatusClosed

Patent Owner

Operating Company

PACER

Judge	Period	PO Win Rate
James R. Gilstrap	08/26/19 - 05/06/21	36%

Magistrate

Roy S. Payne

Plaintiff

Party

Name	Ratings
Ultravision Technologies LLC NPE	L1 B

No Parties

Attorney

Name	Ratings
McKool Smith	L5 E
Jennifer L. Truelove	L5 A
Samuel F. Baxter	L5 A
Brown Rudnick LLP	L2 C
Lawrence C. Drucker	L5 B
Alessandra C. Messing	L3 C
Timothy J. Rousseau	L3 D
Sarah G. Hartman	L1 B
Fabricant Rubino Lambrianakos LLPLocal	L1 C
Alfred R. Fabricant	L1 C
Peter Lambrianakos	L1 C
Vincent J. Rubino, III	L1 C
Daniel J. Shea, Jr.	L1 C
Jacob D. Ostling	L1 D
Joseph M. Mercadante	L1 E

No Attorneys

Defendant

Party

Name	Ratings
Holophane Europe Ltd	L1 D
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd	L5 A
Holophane SA de CV	L1 D
Acuity Brands Inc	L1 D
Yaham Optoelectronics Co Ltd	-- -- --
Arizona Tianjin Electronics Products Trade Co Ltd NPE	-- -- --

No Parties

Attorney

Name	Ratings
Gillam & Smith LLPLocal	L5 A
Melissa R. Smith	L5 A
Andrew T. Gorham	L5 A
Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP	L4 A
T. Vann Pearce, Jr.	L1 B
Jeffrey L. Johnson	L1 C
Yufeng Ma	L1 E
Duane Morris LLP	L4 B
Matthew S. Yungwirth	L4 A
Gilbert A. Greene	L4 C
John R. Gibson	L3 B
Aleksander J. Goranin	L1 B
Ropes & Gray LLP	L4 B
Alexander E. Middleton	L1 A
David S. Chun	L1 B
Samuel L. Brenner	L1 C
Hyun-Joong Kim	L1 C
Steven Pepe	L1 D
Mann Tindel & ThompsonLocal	L3 B
G. Blake Thompson	L2 A
J. Mark Mann	L2 A

No Attorneys