DCT

1:26-cv-03752

Finish Time Holdings LLC v. Strava Inc

Log In
Key Events
Complaint
complaint Intelligence

I. Executive Summary and Procedural Information

  • Parties & Counsel:
  • Case Identification: 1:26-cv-03752, USDC Colorado, 08/17/2026
  • Venue Allegations: Venue is based on Defendant Strava, Inc. having a regular and established place of business in the District of Colorado.
  • Core Dispute: Plaintiff alleges that Defendant's Strava App, a fitness tracking platform, infringes a portfolio of thirteen U.S. patents related to systems and methods for providing an athlete's live training data to a coach.
  • Technical Context: The technology operates in the digital fitness and remote athletic coaching market, involving wearable sensors, data synchronization, and cloud-based platforms for performance monitoring.
  • Key Procedural History: The complaint notes that during the prosecution of several related patents, initial rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 101 for being directed to abstract ideas were overcome by arguing the claims recited specific, unconventional technical solutions. The complaint also references a prior lawsuit where Defendant Strava, Inc. allegedly made arguments supporting the patent eligibility of similar technology, which Plaintiff suggests applies to the Asserted Patents here.

Case Timeline

Date Event
2012-10-19 Earliest Priority Date for all Asserted Patents
2016-05-24 U.S. Patent No. 9,345,948 Issues
2018-02-13 U.S. Patent No. 9,889,340 Issues
2019-06-18 U.S. Patent No. 10,322,314 Issues
2020-10-06 U.S. Patent No. 10,792,537 Issues
2020-10-13 U.S. Patent No. 10,799,763 Issues
2021-02-16 U.S. Patent No. 10,918,911 Issues
2021-06-01 U.S. Patent No. 11,024,413 Issues
2021-09-14 U.S. Patent No. 11,120,902 Issues
2022-02-08 U.S. Patent No. 11,244,751 Issues
2022-05-03 U.S. Patent No. 11,322,240 Issues
2023-11-07 U.S. Patent No. 11,810,656 Issues
2024-03-05 U.S. Patent No. 11,923,066 Issues
2025-06-24 U.S. Patent No. 12,340,891 Issues
2025-09-30 Strava files patent lawsuit against Garmin
2026-08-17 Complaint Filing Date

II. Technology and Patent(s)-in-Suit Analysis

U.S. Patent No. 10,322,314 - Method for providing a coach with live training data of an athlete as the athlete is performing a swimming workout

Issued June 18, 2019

The Invention Explained

  • Problem Addressed: The patent's background describes the disruption to an athlete's training regimen that occurs when an athlete and their preferred coach become physically separated, for instance, due to a move Compl. ¶9 '314 Patent, col. 1:26-38
  • The Patented Solution: The invention is a method using a web-based platform to maintain the coach-athlete relationship remotely. The method involves creating an athlete profile on a server, receiving workout data (e.g., distance, time) from a mobile tracking device worn on the athlete's chest during a swimming workout, updating a training record with this data, and permitting the coach to log into the platform to view the record as the workout is being performed '314 Patent, abstract '314 Patent, col. 3:2-10 The system architecture is depicted in the complaint via a reproduction of Figure 1 from the patent, which shows a platform comprising a processor and various databases Compl. ¶33
  • Technical Importance: The invention provided a technical framework to move beyond asynchronous or manual training logs, enabling a coach to monitor an athlete's performance data in near real-time regardless of physical location '314 Patent, col. 2:5-9

Key Claims at a Glance

  • The complaint asserts at least independent claim 1 Compl. ¶59
  • Key elements of claim 1 include:
    • creating an athlete profile on a training log server of a computer web-based platform;
    • updating a training record in the athlete profile with workout data from a mobile tracking device worn by the athlete around the athlete's chest as the athlete is performing a swimming workout; and
    • permitting the coach to log onto the platform and view the training record of the athlete profile as the athlete is performing the swimming workout.

U.S. Patent No. 10,792,537 - System and method for providing a coach with live training data of an athlete as the athlete is performing a training workout

Issued October 6, 2020

The Invention Explained

  • Problem Addressed: Similar to the '314 Patent, the invention addresses the challenge of maintaining an effective coaching relationship when the athlete and coach are not in the same physical location '537 Patent, col. 1:31-42
  • The Patented Solution: The patent describes a "training gateway" system comprising a training log server, a training plan database, and a processor. The training log server is synchronized with a device worn by the athlete. The processor is configured to allow a coach, pre-selected by the athlete, to associate workouts with the athlete's profile and to access the athlete's training record as the workout is being performed '537 Patent, abstract '537 Patent, claims 21-22 The complaint includes a diagram from the patent showing the interaction between the athlete, the platform, and the coach's workstation Compl. ¶35
  • Technical Importance: The invention describes a specific, permission-based architecture for a "training gateway," enabling a coach not only to monitor live data but also to remotely manage and deploy training plans to an athlete's profile.

Key Claims at a Glance

  • The complaint asserts at least independent claim 21 Compl. ¶65
  • Key elements of claim 21 include:
    • A training log server configured to maintain athlete profiles and synced to a tracking device worn by the athlete;
    • A training plan database to store workouts; and
    • A processor configured to permit a coach (preselected by the athlete) to associate a workout with an athlete's profile and to provide the coach with access to the training record during the workout.

Multi-Patent Capsule: U.S. Patent No. 9,345,948

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 9,345,948, "System for providing a coach with live training data of an athlete as the athlete is training," issued May 24, 2016 Compl. ¶11
  • Technology Synopsis: This patent describes a system with a training log server synchronized to a device worn by an athlete, allowing for the entry of training data. A processor provides a coach with access to the training record as the data is being entered, a concept central to the family of Asserted Patents Compl. ¶27
  • Asserted Claims: At least independent claim 1 is asserted Compl. ¶47
  • Accused Features: The general functionality of the Strava App, which allegedly allows for the collection and sharing of training data Compl. ¶¶43-44

Multi-Patent Capsule: U.S. Patent No. 9,889,340

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 9,889,340, "Method for providing a coach with live training data of an athlete as the athlete is training," issued February 13, 2018 Compl. ¶12
  • Technology Synopsis: The patent describes a method using a web-based platform and a mobile tracking device to provide a coach with live training data as an athlete performs a workout. The method is intended to enable a coach to alter a workout "on the spot" if the athlete is not training within expected parameters Compl. ¶28
  • Asserted Claims: At least independent claim 1 is asserted Compl. ¶53
  • Accused Features: The Strava App's alleged capability to track and share athletic performance data between users Compl. ¶¶43-44

The complaint asserts eleven additional patents not detailed here: '763, '911, '413, '902, '751, '240, '656, '066, '891, '537, and '314, which appear to cover similar technology tailored to specific activities like swimming, cycling, or running Compl. ¶¶13-23

III. The Accused Instrumentality

Product Identification

  • The accused instrumentality is the "Strava App," which includes Defendant's website and mobile application Compl. ¶43

Functionality and Market Context

  • The complaint describes the Strava App as an "online fitness tracking platform" that enables users to "track your running and riding with GPS, join Challenges, share photos from your activities, and follow friends" Compl. ¶43
  • Plaintiff alleges that Strava collaborates with third-party wearable device manufacturers such as Garmin, Oakley, and FORM to record and share exercise data Compl. ¶44
  • The complaint cites press reports stating Strava has over 150 million registered users worldwide Compl. ¶43

IV. Analysis of Infringement Allegations

The complaint references, but does not include, claim charts attached as exhibits that allegedly detail the infringement of each Asserted Patent Compl. ¶¶47; 53 In the absence of these exhibits, the analysis is based on the narrative allegations.

U.S. Patent No. 10,322,314 Infringement Allegations

Plaintiff alleges that the Strava App infringes at least claim 1 of the '314 Patent Compl. ¶59 The infringement theory appears to map Strava's user profiles to the claimed "athlete profile," its data synchronization with wearable devices to the "updating...with workout data from a mobile tracking device," and its social sharing features to "permitting the coach to log onto the platform and view the training record" Compl. ¶¶43-44

  • Identified Points of Contention:
    • Scope Questions: Claim 1 is specifically directed to a "swimming workout" and requires data from a "mobile tracking device worn by the athlete around the athlete's chest." An issue may be whether the Strava App's functionality meets these specific limitations, particularly as the complaint mentions its use for "running and riding" and its collaboration with goggle-based swimming trackers (FORM), which are not worn on the chest Compl. ¶¶43-44
    • Technical Questions: A key question will be whether Strava's platform provides a designated "coach" with access to view an athlete's data as the athlete is performing the workout. The claim's "live" aspect suggests a real-time data stream, raising the question of whether Strava's functionality is synchronous or asynchronous post-workout data sharing.

U.S. Patent No. 10,792,537 Infringement Allegations

Plaintiff alleges that the Strava App infringes at least claim 21 of the '537 Patent Compl. ¶65 The core of this allegation is that the Strava platform functions as the claimed "training gateway," with its servers, databases, and processors providing the architecture for a "coach" to manage and monitor an "athlete" (Compl. ¶¶33; 35).

  • Identified Points of Contention:
    • Scope Questions: Claim 21 recites a specific system architecture, including a "processor configured to permit a coach preselected by the athlete to associate a new workout from the training plan database with one of the athlete profiles." This raises the question of whether Strava's social "follower" model provides the specific functionality for a third party to act as a "coach" by assigning workouts to another user's profile, as required by the claim.
    • Technical Questions: The claim requires a "training log server being synced to a tracking device." The interpretation of "synced" may be critical. The court may need to determine if this requires a specific, continuous, and integrated data link, or if it can be read on the more general data exchange that occurs between third-party devices and the Strava platform.

V. Key Claim Terms for Construction

  • Term from the '314 Patent: "as the athlete is performing the swimming workout"

    • Context and Importance: This term is critical for establishing the "live" aspect of the claimed method. Its construction will determine whether infringement requires real-time, synchronous data viewing by the coach during the activity itself, or if post-workout data review is sufficient.
    • Intrinsic Evidence for Interpretation:
      • Evidence for a Broader Interpretation: The specification discusses providing "live updates" to the platform, which could suggest any communication that occurs while the training session is active, even if viewed with a slight delay '314 Patent, col. 14:38-41
      • Evidence for a Narrower Interpretation: The specification also contemplates a "data dump" that occurs "only after the training activity is complete," which may support a narrower construction requiring truly simultaneous performance and viewing '314 Patent, col. 14:41-45

  • Term from the '537 Patent: "coach"

    • Context and Importance: The definition of "coach" is central to whether Strava's social networking model falls within the patent's scope. Practitioners may focus on this term because if "coach" requires a formal, managing role (e.g., assigning workouts), Strava's "follower" feature may not infringe.
    • Intrinsic Evidence for Interpretation:
      • Evidence for a Broader Interpretation: The titles of other patents in the same family, as cited in the complaint, use broader terms like "person" and "trainer," suggesting "coach" may not be strictly limited to a professional role Compl. ¶¶18-20; 22
      • Evidence for a Narrower Interpretation: The patent's background section frames the invention as a solution to a specific problem within the formal coach-athlete relationship '537 Patent, col. 1:31-42 Furthermore, claim 21 gives the "coach" specific permissions, such as associating workouts with an athlete's profile from a "training plan database," implying a role with more authority than a social media "friend" or "follower" '537 Patent, claim 21

VI. Other Allegations

  • Indirect Infringement: The complaint alleges that Strava induces infringement by "promoting, advertising, and instructing customers and potential customers to use the Strava App, including infringing uses thereof" Compl. ¶¶48; 60; 66
  • Willful Infringement: Plaintiff claims willful infringement based on Strava's alleged knowledge of the Asserted Patents "no later than the filing of this Complaint" Compl. ¶¶49; 61; 67 This constitutes an allegation of post-suit willfulness.

VII. Analyst's Conclusion: Key Questions for the Case

  1. A central issue will be one of definitional scope: can the term "coach", as used in the patents and defined by a specific set of functions like assigning workouts, be construed to read on the "follower" or "friend" relationships in Defendant's social fitness platform? The outcome of this question may determine whether the accused social sharing features perform the claimed coaching functions.

  2. A key evidentiary question will be one of technical and functional operation: does the Strava App provide for the live viewing of an athlete's data by a third party as the workout is being performed, as required by the claims? The case may turn on evidence distinguishing between real-time data streaming to a coaching persona versus asynchronous, post-activity data sharing among users.

  3. Finally, a foundational legal battle will likely concern patent eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The complaint preemptively argues that the patents claim a specific, unconventional technical improvement over prior art, citing their prosecution histories and Strava's own arguments in a prior case. A key question for the court will be whether the claims are directed to the abstract idea of remote performance monitoring or if they contain a sufficient inventive concept that grounds them in a patent-eligible technical solution.