CAFC

26-1035

ParkerVision Inc v. Qualcomm Inc

General

Filed10/09/25

Appeal FromM.D. Florida

Originating Case6:14-cv-00687

Decision09/30/26

Appeal Outcome--

SourcePACER

Judges

Judge	Cases	PO Affirm Rate	Ch Affirm Rate
Sharon Prost	3000+	81%	33%
Raymond T. Chen	2000+	85%	22%
Leonard P. Stark	600+	87%	27%

Appellant

Party

Name	Ratings
ParkerVision Inc NPE	L2E

Attorney

Name	Ratings
McKool Smith	L4E
Kevin L. Burgess	---- --
Charles E. Fowler, Jr.	---- --
Colin Hickl	---- --
Allen, Dyer, Doppelt + Gilchrist, PA	L1E
Ava K. Doppelt	---- --
Budwin Kamprath Burgess Campbell PLLC	---- --
Joshua W. Budwin	---- --

Appellee

Party

Name	Ratings
Qualcomm Atheros Inc	L4E
Qualcomm	L4E

Attorney

Name	Ratings
Cooley LLP	L4B
Eamonn Gardner	---- --
Dena Chen	---- --
Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP	L2B
Robert A. Van Nest	L2B
Matthew J. Brigham	---- --
Matthew M. Werdegar	---- --
Sophie Hood	---- --
Anjali Srinivasan	---- --