CAFC
16-2323
Papst Licensing GmbH Co v. Xilinx
General
Filed07/12/16
Appeal FromN.D. California
Originating Case5:16-cv-00925
Decision04/12/17
Appeal OutcomeAppellee
PACER16-2323
Judges
Judge | Cases | PO Affirm Rate | Ch Affirm Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
900+ | 75% | 42% | |
800+ | 72% | 33% | |
400+ | 64% | 24% |
Appellant
Party
Attorney
Appellee
Party
Attorney